“We thought if ultra-high pressure waterjet technology can slice hardened steel, it can cut through thick crop residue for planting,” said Bunker.
“When we saw an early prototype plant corn seeds in a gravel parking lot, it inspired us. It helped us appreciate the potential, and we became champions of the technology,” said Kobzik and Vandergon.
The primary goals of conservation tillage are to stop the loss of topsoil, reduce the need for fertilizer, minimize chemical runoff, and rebuild soil structure. In addition, it is estimated that no-till methods can sequester an average of 0.3 metric tons of carbon per acre, helping reduce the carbon footprint of crop production. These benefits combine to improve soil health, which increases the farmer’s yield and profitability.
With this technology, farmers can apply the soil-building practice of conservation tillage as long as they like.
“The faster we can get this technology into the hands of farmers, the more good it can do. The idea is to retrofit existing planters, making it easy and cost-effective for traditional and no-till farmers to adopt,” says Bunker.
Exploring Commercialization Options
I-Cubed and Hypertherm decided to collaborate. They spent the next few years developing and refining their prototype.
Once they completed field trials and their IP protection efforts, they spent the better part of a year evaluating different commercialization options.
The owners considered partnering with equipment manufacturers. They approached venture capitalists, incubators, and accelerators. Nothing seemed to address the core constraints.
They kept coming back to the same set of challenges. Neither company focused on agricultural equipment. They lacked experience and relevant contacts in the industry. They did not have a Founder-CEO to lead the venture, and were unsure how to find one. They had little experience raising capital from angels or institutional investors.
“We realized the opportunity was bigger than both companies could handle on our own,” said Kobzik. “We did not want our lack of experience and resources to stall a promising innovation.
There was also a concern that if we sold the IP to an equipment manufacturer, the idea might get shelved and never developed.“
A Chance Introduction To Carrot Ventures
A chance introduction brought the I-Cubed and Carrot Ventures teams together at an AgTech venture financing conference.
“Carrot followed up. They gave us a presentation and explained how their company formation model worked to our advantage. It was very appealing, and we thought their approach would address many of the obstacles we faced.
Carrot’s founder, AVAC Group, has a positive reputation within the agricultural and finance sectors, and Carrot Ventures is backed by another industry leader, Farm Credit Canada (FCC). It just seemed like a really good fit. We decided to proceed and work through Carrot’s extensive vetting and evaluation process,” said Kobzik.
What Attracted The CEO?
We asked Michael Cully, the Founder and CEO of Susterre, what attracted him to Carrot Ventures and the technology. He shared the following:
“There were a few core things that got my attention. First was the technology. Of course, I did my own due diligence, but Carrot had already completed an extremely thorough assessment of the technology. They did a great job of helping me see that the opportunity was real.
Second, still related to the technology, was its purpose. If you care about farming and the environment, conservation tillage is important. The opportunity just fits for me and what I care about personally and professionally. I realized as the Founder and CEO, I could bring all my skills and experience from the ag equipment industry to the table and make a difference while growing a great company. It was very appealing.
The third thing was the Carrot process. They showed up with the intent to accelerate the company’s development from zero to worthy of institutional investment quickly.
Carrot jump started us into a much more mature business model than most start-ups would have at this stage.
They provided financial and legal support, industry experience, board-level governance, and critical insight into the institutional financing decision process right out of the gate.
Carrot likely saved us 18 months or more in setup time. They provided a straight-line path to follow, loads of support, and access to their network. With Carrot and AVAC behind us, we got meetings we would have struggled to get on our own.
We’re still a start-up, but we already have mature business structures and processes, enabling us to move quickly and scale rapidly.
Because Carrot and AVAC are institutional investors, they’re highly valuable in explaining what their peers expect to see. They helped shape the company structure and narrative to fit investability standards.”
Why Consider The Carrot Model?
Cully shared his thoughts on why other executives should consider the Carrot model.
“Beyond what I’ve shared already, you know that you’re not alone. You have a team of invested professionals available and a board of directors right from the outset. The team works with you to push, align and de-risk the process all at the same time.
It would take a lot of time and effort to assemble the high caliber of people and recreate the same support structures in an early-stage start-up.
I know I said this before, but Carrot’s role is to accelerate the setup, legal, financing and commercialization process in a very cost-effective and time-efficient manner. You have to look very closely at the time and risk-mitigation advantages they represent when making your decision.”
IP Holder Considerations
We asked the same question to I-Cubed and Hypertherm about what they would share with other IP holders considering the Carrot Model:
“I’m very entrepreneurial,” says Vandergon. “The biggest thing you need to recognize is where your strengths are and where they are lacking. If you look at the statistics, the failure rate of start-up ventures is high. I think they fail primarily due to a lack of expertise, which results in errors and costly delays.
If you don’t have experience in commercialization, which typically inventors don’t, it’s going to be a long road. I think you’ll have a higher potential for success and a shorter path if you partner with someone who has the experience you lack.
We’ve found that to be successful in these ventures, you need the right combination of people, the technical and business acumen, and the money. Carrot provided a means to pull all the elements together quickly.”
Kobzik added, “One of the things we appreciate about Carrot is how inclusive they are. They involved us in the whole process as they moved through the recruiting, company formation, and financing steps. We really appreciated Carrot keeping us abreast of the decision-making process. There have been no surprises and no regrets. Everything has unfolded as anticipated, and we’re excitedly watching for the next phases to unfold.”
We want to thank the contributors for sharing their insights and experience. We hope this article will help others appreciate the Carrot Ventures Company Formation Model from the perspective of the inventor, IP holders and the recruited Founder and CEO.
Learn more about the contributors at the links below.
Michael Cully is the Founder and CEO of Susterre Technologies Inc.
David Bunker is the Founder and CEO of I-Cubed Industry Innovators Inc.
Jay Kobzik is responsible for Strategic Accounts at Hypertherm Inc.
Cedar Vandergon is the Waterjet Engineering Manager at Hypertherm Inc.